Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 4:47:45 GMT -5
Ain the data sheets the visit. The results of these checks are recorded in the visit records. The sheets will be accompanied by any other documents that the evaluators will consider necessary in order to obtain a complete picture of the degree of fulfillment of the standards. The visit forms will be signed by all members of the visiting committee described in point as well as by the management of the institution IOSUD and the doctoral school. . The visiting commission coordinator prepares with the support of the technical assistant the external evaluation report. This report will include the CNATDCU report on the quality of the human resources of each field subject to evaluation criterion the.
CNCS report on the quality of scientific research at the level of Country Email List each field subject to evaluation criterion the report of the authorized agency on all the criteria included in the annex to this methodology with the exception of criteria and and a series of information regarding the quality of the doctoral school and the institutional capacity of IOSUD a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the data collected or validated following the visit an analysis of the trends recorded by at the previous evaluation in the case of the periodic evaluation an analysis of the strong and weak points identified as well as a series of recommendations regarding quality improvement.
The external evaluation report will include the opinion regarding accreditation nonaccreditation maintenance of accreditation or withdrawal of accreditation for each field included in the doctoral school subject to evaluation.positive if one of the CNATDCU or CNCS reports and opinions is negative. A doctoral school is accredited respectively its accreditation is maintained exclusively in the fields that meet the standards contained in this methodology and in the subsequent documents. The authorized agency can also propose the organization of a monitoring visit under the conditions.
CNCS report on the quality of scientific research at the level of Country Email List each field subject to evaluation criterion the report of the authorized agency on all the criteria included in the annex to this methodology with the exception of criteria and and a series of information regarding the quality of the doctoral school and the institutional capacity of IOSUD a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the data collected or validated following the visit an analysis of the trends recorded by at the previous evaluation in the case of the periodic evaluation an analysis of the strong and weak points identified as well as a series of recommendations regarding quality improvement.
The external evaluation report will include the opinion regarding accreditation nonaccreditation maintenance of accreditation or withdrawal of accreditation for each field included in the doctoral school subject to evaluation.positive if one of the CNATDCU or CNCS reports and opinions is negative. A doctoral school is accredited respectively its accreditation is maintained exclusively in the fields that meet the standards contained in this methodology and in the subsequent documents. The authorized agency can also propose the organization of a monitoring visit under the conditions.